Verso. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche anche epicuree sopra Servio e la cultura dell’esegesi filosofica del saga anche dei poeti verso Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
A. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Conversation international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 per niente 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
Ed. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ in den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” sopra F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung mediante der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato mediante: Come sopra, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, ed. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant sicuro document the direction(s) sopra which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) sopra the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published in the most recent elenco of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up onesto the reader onesto discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on per par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “puro http://datingranking.net/it/huggle-review expound the meaning of [something]; onesto render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; esatto elucidate; esatto explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made per wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning onesto verso commentary on verso collection of poetry.
For verso theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism per the age of the electronic mezzi di comunicazione,” in: G. W. Most (addirittura.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Ed. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), esatto name but per few.
W., at 283–284, gives per list of the most important editions and commentaries, onesto which one might want sicuro add Per. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis ed Marziale: il ciclo del interpretazione V, Libreria di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is a valuable supplement onesto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and Verso. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late puro be included mediante W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant sicuro be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography durante Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late puro be included durante W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For per useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (addirittura.),Toto notus per orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.
